« おはようございます | Main | 九つの物語 »

December 14, 2004

McKee(1992)

Daryl McKee, "An Organizational Learning Approach to Product
Innovation", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.9,
pp.232-245, 1992.
論文ゼミのマルタソ物件.
検索結果出しといてなんですが,正直ビミョンヌな感じでしたね.
それはそれとして,メモはしておこう.
組織学習の定義が強調する3つの要因.
わりかし一般的な話だけど,なかなかしっかり書いているのは少ないと.

Definitions of organizational learning emphasize three
factors: (1) organizational interaction with the environment; (2)
changes in organizational modeling of the environment and (3)
organizational action.
(pp.233)

サイバネティクスと組織学習を絡めようってのも,わりかしメジャーなはなしだけども.KimとかEspejoとか.ここでひいているのはBeer大先生なわけですが.
# でもKimのが確か1993年でEspejoのは1996年なので,気づきの早さはそんなに変わらないのか.
This model, adapted from Beer [8], includes four primary
elements: information inputs, a decision network, organizational norms
and technologies and product outputs. Information inputs may be
characterized in terms of the scope and depth of information obtained
from the environment. The decision network consists of the linkages
among decision makers required to reach a decision on a given issue.
Organizational norms and technologies consist of the accepted "way we
do things around here." Product outputs include the goods and services
developed and marketed by an organization. These elements may be
related through two learning "loops." "Single-loop" learning occurs
when the decision network utilizes information inputs to modify
products without changing existing organizational norms and
technologies. "Double-loop" learning involves change in organizational
norms nad technologies as well.
(pp.236)

この論文自体のmain resultってやつは,イノベーションとしての組織学習をdiagnoseするためのframeworkを提示したってところ.
This article proides a framework to diagnose
organizational learning of innovation. Firms engaged in incremental
innovation must be supported by single-loop learning skills, such as
identified in Table 1. Firms engaged in discontinuous innovation must
have these skills, as well as the identified double-loop learning
skills. The few firms that do both routinely must have additional
skills as well; they must somehow generize what is learned from
particular innovation projects to the firm's next innovation. This also
suggests opportunities for research.
(pp.243)

Posted by ysk5 at December 14, 2004 10:28 PM